Investment Institute
Market Alerts

US reaction: Fed reacts to short-run data with jumbo cut

KEY POINTS
The Fed cut rates by 0.50% today, more than suggested by speakers before purdah, but in keeping with press guidance during the purdah period

The Fed’s statement suggested this would be part of a series of cuts and the ‘dot plot’ forecast another 0.50% of easing this year, 1.00% next and 0.50% the year after – a notable acceleration from 13 weeks ago.
The Fed’s economic projections now see a sharper rise in unemployment this year, but growth and inflation outlooks were little changed.
Powell provided little economic justification for the Fed’s aggressive start, but rejected the suggestion that the Fed was “catching-up” for a late start to the easing cycle.
The Fed’s recent reactivity to short-term data has increased rate market volatility.
We assume it will settle into a more gradual approach and deliver two more 0.25% cuts this year.
Next year’s outlook will depend on the election outlook. However, under a number of electoral scenarios, it looks challenging for the Fed to keep inflation sustainably around target with rates as low as the Fed now projects.

The Fed began its rate easing cycle with a 0.50% rate cut taking the Fed Funds Rate to 5.00-4.75%. This easing defied guidance from Fed officials before the purdah period, which had discussed “moderate”, “gradual” and “cautious” easing of policy restrictiveness and both our own and consensus forecasts that had all looked for a more gradual start to the easing cycle of 0.25%. However, with the Fed appearing to use recognized ‘back-channel’ communications of stories to the Wall Street Journal, markets had begun to suspect in recent days that a bigger easing was on the cards. One member voted against the Committee decision for a 50bps cut, instead voting for a 0.25% reduction.   

The Fed’s accompanying statement spelt out a gradual evolution in thinking. It continued to note that the economy was expanding at a “solid pace”, but did note that employment growth had “slowed” (as opposed to moderated) and that inflation had “made further progress towards” its inflation objective, with risks now “roughly in balance”, as opposed to moving into “better balance”. The statement also stated that when “considering additional adjustments” (previously this had been when considering “any adjustments”) showing that the Fed considered this the start of an easing process.

This outlook for lower rates was clearly spelt out in the Fed’s quarterly Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) (Exhibit 1). Following today’s 50bp cut, the SEP showed median Fed forecasts for two more 25bps cuts this year (to 4.5-4.25%) (November and December) and then four 25bps cuts across 2025 to 3.5-3.25% (with two projected for 2026) (Exhibit 2). This came with modest underlying economic forecasts. GDP forecasts were largely unchanged at 2.0% (although the Fed raised its trend pace of growth, lifting it to 2.0% from 1.8%). The unemployment forecast was revised higher to 4.4% for this year and next (from 4.0% and 4.2%). And inflation was revised lower for this year to 2.3% from 2.6% (2.6% from 2.8% for core) for this year and 2.1% from 2.3% (2.2% from 2.3% for core) for next. Exhibit 3 illustrates that the scale of Fed rate projection adjustments was far more than the inferred policy prescription changes using the Fed’s economic projections  

The Fed Chair’s press conference addressed the sharp change in the Fed’s outlook, including the unusual practice outside of recession of beginning an easing cycle with a 50bps cut. He cited the two payrolls reports, which had shown a dip in payrolls and rise in the unemployment rate, which the Fed had not been expecting. He also repeatedly mentioned the revisions process to payrolls for Mar 23 – Mar 24, stating that the Fed was “mentally adjusting” current numbers with that in mind. And he said that the decision had been made in part on a “risk management” basis, rather than purely an economic outlook. Powell did, however, suggest that we should not look at “this [50bps cut] and think that this is the new pace”. Indeed, the Fed Chair provided little justification for why the Fed had cut by 50bps, other than his overriding assessment that the US economy “was in a good place and today’s decision was about trying to keep it there”.

Fed Chair Powell suggested that in terms of the outlook a good place to start was the SEP outlook. However, the last 13 weeks has shown that as an unreliable guide at best. In June, 11 of 19 members thought there would be one cut this year at most, today only two members think the Fed are done and 10 look for at least two more (0.25%) cuts (100bps in total). We ourselves had seen the shift in Fed’s reaction function and had recently been expecting three cuts to 4.75-4.50%, by year-end. However, following today’s 50bp we now expect two more 0.25% cuts to 4.50-4.25%. However, we recognize the Fed’s recent reactivity to short-term data as a risk to that view. The Chair explained that future decisions would be based on the evolution of data and stated decisions to speed up or slowdown the pace of tightening would be taken in the light of upcoming employment data. However, it is this reactivity to short-term data that saw the Fed eschew gradual easing over recent months when other central banks began to ease and now have seen a jumbo first cut. By contrast, the Bank of England for example is reverting to anticipating future economic activity. Fed Chair Powell today said that the Fed “can’t look a year ahead and know what the economy is going to be doing”. This is a problem for an inflation targeting central bank. We assume a more gradual approach going forwards, but upcoming Fed moves will be subject to the natural volatility in the data.

Beyond this year, the Fed appears to take little account of the election cycle. To our minds, this could have a meaningful impact on the Fed’s space to ease policy. A precise forecast will thus only be possible after the election outcome is known later this year. We continue to suggest that a either a Trump win, or some of Harris’ proposed policies will make it difficult for the Fed to ease policy as much as they suggest by end-2025 and we suggest that if the Fed continues to ease policy at this pace without signs of economic slowdown, it risks having to reverse policy over its forecast horizon.

With markets a little over 50/50 in anticipating the size of today’s easing, there was some room for catch-up. Markets increased the chance of another 75bps of easing by year-end to 70%, from 30% before the meeting and 2-year yields yields fell sharply initially, but are currently down just 2bps at 3.62%. 10-year yields however rose a touch by 3bps to 3.71% respectively. The dollar also dropped by 0.6% immediately after the announcement, but subsequently recovered all of this loss.

Exhibit 2: Fed foresees material acceleration in the pace of easing
Exhibit 3: Fed’s dot projections more aggressive than inferred policy rule
Source: FRB, Refinitiv, AXA IM Research, Sept 2024

    Disclaimer

    This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment research or financial analysis relating to transactions in financial instruments as per MIF Directive (2014/65/EU), nor does it constitute on the part of AXA Investment Managers or its affiliated companies an offer to buy or sell any investments, products or services, and should not be considered as solicitation or investment, legal or tax advice, a recommendation for an investment strategy or a personalized recommendation to buy or sell securities.

    It has been established on the basis of data, projections, forecasts, anticipations and hypothesis which are subjective. Its analysis and conclusions are the expression of an opinion, based on available data at a specific date.

    All information in this document is established on data made public by official providers of economic and market statistics. AXA Investment Managers disclaims any and all liability relating to a decision based on or for reliance on this document. All exhibits included in this document, unless stated otherwise, are as of the publication date of this document.

    Furthermore, due to the subjective nature of these opinions and analysis, these data, projections, forecasts, anticipations, hypothesis, etc. are not necessary used or followed by AXA IM’s portfolio management teams or its affiliates, who may act based on their own opinions. Any reproduction of this information, in whole or in part is, unless otherwise authorised by AXA IM, prohibited.

    Issued in the UK by AXA Investment Managers UK Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in the UK. Registered in England and Wales No: 01431068. Registered Office: 22 Bishopsgate London EC2N 4BQ

    In other jurisdictions, this document is issued by AXA Investment Managers SA’s affiliates in those countries.

    © AXA Investment Managers 2024. All rights reserved

    Back to top